Skip to main content
Weave
Stream is live - open Weave Stream (opens in a new tab)

The manuscript development platform for neuroscience.

Weave AI knows neuroscience and learns your research. It follows the literature in Stream, runs the manuscript with your co-authors in Horizon, chooses the journal in Atlas, and gets the draft submission-ready in Word.

Get started for freeSee how it works
Manuscript lifecycle

Four products, one manuscript.

Researchers juggle PubMed, email threads, a journal finder, and a writing tool that don't talk to each other. These four do, because Weave AI is the one intelligence behind them all.

Manage

Weave Horizon

Early 2027

The manuscript development workspace.

Project management built for manuscripts: one shared workspace where your whole team plans, tracks, and decides every stage together, on a framework built by Scribendi and Edanz.

Get early access
The Horizon dashboard for a neuroinflammation project: setup complete, with eight active workstreams from authorship through post-submission, each showing its own progress
  1. Discover

    Weave Stream

    Live now

    A literature feed that learns your research: new papers matched to your topic, from a real PubMed query you can see and edit.

    Get started for free
  2. Target

    Weave Atlas

    September 2026

    Journal recommendation built for your manuscript: journals ranked by what matters to you, with the reasoning behind every rank.

    Get early access
  3. Write

    Weave for Word

    Late 2026

    A writing assistant built into Word: your draft checked against the target journal's requirements, with referee-style review and a readiness score before you submit.

    Get early access

Weave AI

One intelligence, trained on neuroscience.

Weave AI is built for neuroscience, not adapted to it, and it keeps up as new research is published. It learns your research, follows the literature in Stream, ranks journals in Atlas, and is the writing assistant inside Word. The same intelligence throughout, so what it learns in one product is already there in the next.

  • 01

    Peer review

    Reads the whole paper the way a careful referee does: what the study claims, what it actually shows, and where the gap between the two sits. It separates the objections that would sink a submission from the ones an author can fix in a week, and it says where it would land.

    • Major concerns
    • Minor concerns
    • Missing controls
    • Statistical issues
    • Accept to reject
  • 02

    Claim consistency

    Walks every conclusion back to the result it rests on. A correlation quietly becoming a cause, a mechanism asserted from an association, a hedge that goes missing between the results and the abstract: it flags the sentence, not just the section.

    • Evidence match
    • Overclaim detection
    • Causal-inflation risk
  • 03

    Reproducibility

    Asks the only question that matters of a methods section: could another lab run this? It looks for procedural detail that is actually written down rather than implied, for data and code a reader can reach, and for whether randomization and blinding were reported at all.

    • Protocol clarity
    • Data and code
    • Randomization
    • Blinding
    • 0 to 10 score
  • 04

    Bias and confounds

    Design decides what a result can mean, long before the statistics do. This reads the study for the variables that travel with the effect, the population it was measured in, and the distance between who was studied and who the conclusion is written about.

    • Design biases
    • Confounds
    • Sex bias
    • Demographic reporting
    • Overgeneralization
  • 05

    Methods audit

    Inventories every technique the paper leans on and rates how rigorously each one was applied, not how confidently it was described. A method can be state of the art and still be run in a way that cannot carry the claim.

    • Imaging
    • Electrophysiology
    • Genetic tools
    • Assays
    • Statistics
    • Rigor rating
  • 06

    Specific aims

    Turns the paper you just read into the grant you have not written yet: the objective it implies, the hypothesis worth testing next, and three aims with the outcome each one would produce.

    • Objective
    • Central hypothesis
    • Three aims
    • Expected outcomes
    • Impact
  • 07

    Alternative mechanisms

    Names the explanations the authors did not test, weighs how plausible each one is, and pairs it with the experiment that would rule it out.

    • Competing mechanisms
    • Plausibility
    • Falsification test
  • 08

    Multi-level interpretation

    A finding rarely stops at the scale it was measured. This reads the result upward and downward, from molecules to behavior, so the implications land at every level the work touches.

    • Molecular
    • Cellular
    • Circuit
    • Systems
    • Behavioral
  • 09

    Field positioning

    Places the work in its literature: the subfield it speaks to, whether it confirms or unsettles the prevailing view, and the gap it fills.

    • Subfield
    • Paradigm status
    • Literature gap
  • 10

    Abstract gaps

    Reads an abstract for what is not in it, and names the details a reader needs before they can judge the work at all.

    • Species and strain
    • Sample size
    • Dosage
    • Remaining gaps
  • 11

    Hard negative

    Argues the most convincing wrong reading of the study, then takes it apart. If a result can be misread, it is better to see how here than in a review.

    • Plausible misreading
    • Why it fails
    • Correction

Weave for Word

Write submission-ready manuscripts.

Weave AI works where your manuscript is written. It checks your draft against the target journal's requirements, reviews it the way a referee would, and gives you a readiness score before you submit. Arriving late 2026.

Get early access

See everything Weave AI can do

StreamLive now

Never miss a paper.

Build a stream from your keywords and research focus, and new neuroscience papers come to you. Weave AI expands it with MeSH terms and synonyms into a real PubMed query you can see and edit.

Get started for free
  • Weave Stream's Neuroscience Today feed: the day's newest articles in date order, with Create Stream in the sidebar
    Start today. Open Weave Stream to a clean, date-sorted feed of the latest neuroscience articles. When you're ready to track, click "Create Stream."
  • The Create Stream dialog: a name and description above separate fields for required keywords, excluded keywords and nice-to-have terms
    Create your stream. Name your stream and add the keywords you care about: inclusion, exclusion, and nice-to-have terms.
  • A Depression Biomarkers stream with its query panel open, showing the MeSH and synonym terms behind each keyword and the excluded terms below them
    Edit your stream and query. Your new stream now tracks PubMed for your topic of interest. In the side panel, you can see the expanded MeSH + synonym query behind it. Edit the query anytime to fine-tune what your stream surfaces.
  • Notification settings for a stream: a single toggle enabling an email digest when new articles match it
    Set up notifications. Decide whether to be notified for each new article in your stream.

Learn more about Stream

AtlasSeptember 2026

Choose the journal with confidence.

Add your title, abstract, and MeSH terms, set what matters most (speed, impact factor, cost, open access), and Weave AI ranks the journals that fit, with the reasoning shown: why each one ranks where it does, and why others were left out.

Get early access
  • Atlas's tradeoff map plotting candidate journals by impact against time to decision, with the fastest option and the highest-impact option called out beneath it
    Priority trade-offs. Weight speed, impact, and cost. The ranking follows your priorities.
  • Atlas's ranked journal matches, one expanded to show its topic fit, impact and speed scores alongside quartile, acceptance rate and open-access status
    A ranking you can interrogate. Every recommendation explains itself, exclusions included.
  • Atlas's run history listing pinned and recent journal-matching runs, each with its match count and top journal, beside the current ranking
    Run history. Re-run as the manuscript evolves and compare what changed.

Learn more about Atlas

HorizonEarly 2027

The manuscript development workspace.

Run the manuscript as a project, with every co-author in one workspace. Authorship, key decisions, the journal choice, and the path to submission, all tracked on the manuscript development framework Scribendi and Edanz use with authors every day.

Get early access
  • The Horizon dashboard for a neuroinflammation project: setup complete, with eight active workstreams from authorship through post-submission, each showing its own progress
    The whole manuscript, in one place. Key decisions, author information, tasks, and checklists: everything the manuscript needs, tracked in one workspace.
  • A Horizon workstream task table: tasks with owners, due dates, references, progress and a Depends on column tying each step to the ones before it
    Visibility on who is doing what. Prioritize tasks, manage dependencies, and ensure critical steps are completed in the correct order for smooth project progression.
  • Horizon's project switcher listing eight separate neuroscience projects, beside a new workstream offering to start from scratch or import Weave AI's suggested tasks
    All your projects in one place. Seamlessly manage multiple projects with different members. Each workspace keeps its content, data, and people separate.
  • Key decisions placeholder artwork (final product screenshot to come)
    Log, track, and review critical decisions. Track key decisions and their rationale, linked to project milestones, with real-time updates, collaboration, and an audit trail.
  • Horizon's author information table with corresponding-author flags and CRediT contributions, beside one author's full profile: ORCID, academic position, bio and permissions
    No more manual collection. Streamline the collection and organization of author information, ensuring accuracy and compliance.
  • Horizon's project documentation table: IRB approvals, funding agreements, data sharing agreements and governance records, each with its document type, status, version and owner
    Submission-ready documentation. Collect the documents journals ask for as you go: archived, accessible, and ready when you submit.

Learn more about Horizon

A human expert, one click away.

In Stream, Atlas, Word, or Horizon, one button reaches one of 500+ editors and subject-matter scientists at Scribendi and Edanz, with two decades of manuscripts in your field behind them. They pick up where Weave AI leaves off.

  • A referee-style read before you submit
  • Editing to your target journal's standard
  • Journal strategy, even after a rejection
  • A response to reviewers, drafted with you

Research Consultant

Dr. Katherine Halievski

Neuroendocrinology

“Most manuscripts I see are one restructure away from being publishable. Getting the order of the argument right does more for a paper than another month of language editing ever will.”
Team

The team behind Weave.

Built by the teams behind Scribendi and Edanz, helping researchers get published since 1997.

Dr. James Graham, Advisory Board Chair & Neuroscientist

Dr. James Graham

Advisory Board Chair & Neuroscientist

A neuroscientist specialising in molecular neuroscience and neurodegenerative disease, with over 20 years in research and 70+ manuscripts taken to publication with authors worldwide. He created the manuscript development framework that Weave Horizon is built on.

Connect on LinkedIn

Built to get you published.

Weave knows neuroscience and your research, so it finds the papers that matter, the journal that fits, and tells you when you're ready to submit.

Get started for free

No credit card.